1xbet
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
1xbet-1xir.com
betforward
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
betforward.com.co
yasbetir1.xyz
winbet-bet.com
1kickbet1.com
1xbet-ir1.xyz
hattrickbet1.com
4shart.com
manotobet.net
hazaratir.com
takbetir2.xyz
1betcart.com
betforwardperir.xyz
betforward-shart.com
betforward.com.co
betforward.help
betfa.cam
2betboro.com
1xbete.org
1xbett.bet
romabet.cam
megapari.cam
mahbet.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbet
1xbet
alvinbet.site
alvinbet.bet
alvinbet.help
alvinbet.site
alvinbet.bet
alvinbet.help
1xbet giris
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
1xbetgiris.cam
pinbahis.com.co
pinbahis.com.co
pinbahis.com.co
pinbahis.com.co
pinbahis.com.co
pinbahis.com.co
pinbahis.com.co
pinbahis.com.co
pinbahis.com.co
pinbahis.com.co
pinbahis.com.co
pinbahis.com.co
pinbahis.com.co
pinbahis.com.co
pinbahis.com.co
betwinner
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
betwiner.org
1xbet
1xbete.org
1xbete.org
1xbete.org
1xbete.org
1xbete.org
1xbete.org
1xbete.org
1xbete.org
1xbete.org
1xbete.org
1xbete.org
1xbete.org
1xbete.org
1xbete.org
1xbete.org
betforward
betforward
betforward
betforward
betforward
betforward
betforward
betforward
yasbet
yasbet
yasbet
yasbet
yasbet
yasbet
yasbet
yasbet
1xbet
1xbet
1xbet
1xbet
1xbet
1xbet
1xbet
1xbet
1xbet
betforward
betforward
betforward
betforward
betforward
betforward
betforward
betforward
yasbet
yasbet
yasbet
yasbet
yasbet
yasbet
yasbet
yasbet
1xbet
1xbet
1xbet
1xbet
1xbet
1xbet
1xbet
1xbet
1xbet
1betcart.com
1betcart.com
1betcart.com
1betcart.com
1betcart.com
1betcart.com
1betcart.com
1betcart.com
1betcart.com
1betcart.com
1betcart.com
1betcart.com
1betcart.com
1betcart.com
1betcart.com
1betcart.com
betcart
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی

Saturday, July 27, 2024
Google search engine
HomeMedien45 Million Euro Annual Budget: "Instructive or patronizing" - CDU Targets Scandal...

45 Million Euro Annual Budget: “Instructive or patronizing” – CDU Targets Scandal Channel of ARD and ZDF

For months, the ranks of the CDU have been discussing the future handling of public broadcasters. A final report of the Federal Executive Commission now outlines how ARD, ZDF and Co. can be made efficient, future-oriented, and transparent. While most considerations are general, special attention is given to a specific channel – in a separate subpoint.

The proposed course corrections also affect the youth channel “Funk”. While “Funk” is indeed aimed at young people, “this does not exempt it from meeting the demands for journalistic education, quality, and neutrality more effectively than before,” the paper states.

“Not instructive or patronizing, not tendentious or one-sided”

In the future, the plurality of offerings, content, and opinions must be ensured. The commission under the leadership of the Minister President of Saxony-Anhalt, Reiner Haseloff, writes that the previous emotional and subjective approach, which puts moderators and their opinions and judgments at the forefront, leads to subjectivity and political bias, and permanently undermines the acceptance of the entire public broadcasting system.

The goal should also be, beyond “Funk”, to strengthen trust in public broadcasting and to become more attractive, especially for younger target groups under the age of 30. This also includes a review of formats and distribution channels in order to tailor them to the target audience. An even-handed educational and informational offering should be aimed for, especially in the children’s and youth sector, which is “neither overwhelming, instructive, or patronizing, nor tendentious or one-sided,” it further states.

Scandal Video of “Funk” Equates Merz and Höcke

The youth channel seems to be a thorn in the side of the CDU. This could be due in part to a scandalous video from the past. In a segment of the show “Die da oben” on the topic “What is right-wing?”, the “Funk” editorial staff equated CDU/CSU with AfD and NPD. The logos of the parties were seen side by side in the preview image. The post stated: “Björn Höcke, Alice Weidel, Friedrich Merz, and Markus Söder have one thing in common: they are right-wing.” This sparked massive criticism. Several Union politicians even suggested abolishing the GEZ fees.

ARD Director Kai Gniffke later felt compelled to issue an apology. In a letter to all faction leaders of the CDU/CSU, he wrote, “The visual presentation of this question, depicting antidemocratic parties alongside democratic organizations, is suggestive, distorting, and inappropriate.” The “Funk” segment (which was deleted after a few hours) was a “serious mistake.”

Shortly thereafter, “Funk” posed the question “What is left-wing?” and adhered to the same visual scheme as the first video. The DDR state symbol hammer and sickle in a wreath of ears, as well as the RAF symbol, were mixed with the logos of SPD, Greens, Die Linke, or MLPD. This time, the editorial staff refrained from including political heads.

Study Examined “Funk” Reports

As of June this year, a scientific study by the Otto-Brenner Foundation has for the first time@endsection

Untersucht wurden auch die Reportageformate von „Funk“. Mehr als 325 Stunden Material wurden geprüft und analysiert.

Die „Funk“-Beiträge fokussieren weniger auf gesellschaftliche Themen wie Politik oder Wirtschaft (26,8 Prozent), sondern vielmehr auf Lebensweltthemen (52,2 Prozent), die für die junge Zielgruppe eine hohe Relevanz haben, wie beispielsweise Sexualität, Drogen, Gesundheit und vor allem Beruf, wie die Autoren der Studie berichten.

Die Ergebnisse zeigen außerdem, dass die „Funk“-Reporter nahezu immer deutlich ihre Meinung äußern. Eine „explizite Meinungsäußerung“ ist in 95,7 Prozent der Fälle in der Gesamtberichterstattung vorhanden. Des Weiteren prägen subjektive Berichterstattungsmuster mit 79 Prozent die journalistische Realitätsdarstellung der „Funk“-Reporterformate, während klassisch narrative (8,6 Prozent) und investigative Muster (5,1 Prozent) deutlich seltener vorkommen. Andere journalistische Konzepte sind praktisch nicht vorhanden.

Erhöhung des Funk-Budgets auf 45,5 Millionen Euro jährlich

Weiter heißt es: „Eine vielseitige Auswahl an verschiedenen Quellenformen fehlt.“ Stattdessen sind in vier von fünf Beiträgen entweder Protagonisten oder Reporter die zentralen Informationsquellen. Die Hauptakteure in den Formaten sind ebenfalls die Protagonisten (zusammen 54 Prozent) und Reporter (31,7 Prozent). Experten oder Bürger treten nur am Rande auf.

Das Jugendangebot „Funk“ wurde am 1. Oktober 2016 gestartet und richtet sich vor allem an die Zielgruppe der 14- bis 29-Jährigen. Produzenten sind ARD und ZDF, wobei der SWR hier die führende Rolle hat. Derzeit umfasst „Funk“ rund 60 Formate und wird ausschließlich in den sozialen Medien und auf einer eigenen Plattform verbreitet.

Das Budget für „Funk“ wurde erst Anfang des Jahres um 750.000 Euro erhöht. Grund hierfür ist eine „realistische Anpassung des Honorarrahmens und ein partieller Teuerungsausgleich“, teilte der SWR mit. Damit beläuft sich der Gesamtbetrag der Online-Jugendangebote von ARD und ZDF heute auf 45,5 Millionen Euro pro Jahr.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments